Establishment and characterization of organoids from a patient with adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.

Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast is a rare tumor that is composed of proliferating epithelial and myoepithelial cells. The pathogenesis of AME remains unclear, and no breast cancer cells have been identified in such tumor tissues. In this study, we established patient-derived breast cancer organoids from the surgical tumor samples of an elderly Chinese woman with an AME of the breast. Our findings confirmed the successful establishment of organoids from an AME of the breast of this patient. A short tandem repeat analysis revealed that the DNA signature of the AME of the breast organoids matched the DNA signature of the original tumor specimen. Moreover, diameter assay confirmed that the organoids from the breast AME showed sensitivity to paclitaxel and doxorubicin treatments, which was similar to, but lesser than that of primary culture cells. In conclusion, we established an efficient 3-dimensional breast cancer organoid culture platform from an AME of the breast. This platform can be effectively used for exploring clinicopathological and genomic characteristics of AME of the breast to identify possible treatments and increase awareness about this disease entity.

HRAS is a therapeutic target in malignant chemo-resistant adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.

Malignant adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast is an exceptionally rare form of breast cancer, with a significant metastatic potential. Chemotherapy has been used in the management of advanced AME patients, however the majority of treatments are not effective. Recent studies report recurrent mutations in the HRAS Q61 hotspot in small series of AMEs, but there are no preclinical or clinical data showing H-Ras protein as a potential therapeutic target in malignant AMEs. We performed targeted sequencing of tumours' samples from new series of 13 AMEs, including 9 benign and 4 malignant forms. Samples from the breast tumour and the matched axillary metastasis of one malignant HRAS mutated AME were engrafted and two patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were established that reproduced the typical AME morphology. The metastasis-derived PDX was treated in vivo by different chemotherapies and a combination of MEK and BRAF inhibitors (trametinib and dabrafenib). All malignant AMEs presented a recurrent mutation in the HRAS G13R or G12S hotspot. Mutation of PIK3CA were found in both benign and malignant AMEs, while AKT1 mutations were restricted to benign AMEs. Treatment of the PDX by the MEK inhibitor trametinib, resulted in a marked anti-tumor activity, in contrast to the BRAF inhibitor and the different chemotherapies that were ineffective. Overall, these findings further expand on the genetic features of AMEs and suggest that patients carrying advanced HRAS-mutated AMEs could potentially be treated with MEK inhibitors.

Problematic breast tumors reassessed in light of novel molecular data.

Breast cancer is a vastly heterogeneous disease encompassing a panoply of special histological subtypes. Although rare breast tumors have largely not been investigated systematically in large scale genomics series, recent studies have shed light on the genetic underpinnings of special histologic subtypes of breast cancer. Genomic analyses of estrogen receptor-positive special histologic types of breast cancer have not resulted in the identification of novel pathognomonic genetic alterations in addition to the confirmation of the presence of CDH1 loss-of-function mutations in invasive lobular carcinomas. By contrast, the analyses of triple-negative breast cancers have demonstrated that low-grade triple-negative breast cancers categorically differ from the common forms of high-grade triple-negative disease biologically and phenotypically and are underpinned by specific fusion genes or hotspot mutations. A subset of low-grade triple-negative disease has been shown to harbor highly recurrent if not pathognomonic genetic alterations, such as ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene in secretory carcinomas, the MYB-NFIB fusion gene, MYBL1 rearrangements or MYB gene amplification in adenoid cystic carcinomas, and HRAS Q61 hotspot mutations coupled with mutations in PI3K pathway genes in estrogen receptor-negative adenomyoepitheliomas. A subset of these pathognomonic genetic alterations (e.g., NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes) now constitute an FDA approved indication for the use of TRK inhibitors in the advanced/metastatic setting. These studies have also corroborated that salivary gland-like tumors of the breast, other than acinic cell carcinomas, harbor the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations detected in their salivary gland counterparts. Reassuringly, the systematic study of special histologic types of breast cancer utilizing state-of-the-art sequencing approaches, rather than rendering pathology obsolete, has actually strengthened the importance of breast cancer histologic typing and is providing additional ancillary markers for the diagnosis of these rare but fascinating entities.

Adenomyoepithelial tumors of the breast: molecular underpinnings of a rare entity.

Adenomyoepitheliomas (AMEs) of the breast are uncommon and span the morphologic spectrum of benign, atypical, in situ, and invasive forms. In exceptionally rare cases, these tumors metastasize to regional lymph nodes or distant sites. In the era of genomic characterization, data is limited regarding AMEs. The aim of this study was to provide insight into the molecular underpinnings of a spectrum of AMEs. Seven cases of AMEs of the breast (benign-1, atypical-2, in situ-1, invasive-3) were identified in our files. The seven samples were interrogated using the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 (ThermoFisher). Two atypical AMEs and the malignant in situ AME harbored the same gain-of-function PIK3CA mutation. The malignant in situ AME also showed EGFR amplification, not described previously. Both a benign AME and a malignant invasive AME shared the same gain-of-function AKT1 variant. The benign AME also showed a GNAS mutation. Moreover, the same gain-of-function HRAS mutation was present in an atypical AME and a malignant invasive AME. We also identified co-occurring HRAS and PIK3CA mutations in an ER-positive atypical AME, which has not been previously described. No fusion drivers were detected. We describe the molecular characteristics of the spectrum of AME tumors of the breast, which harbor alterations in the PI3K/AKT pathway. Our findings are clinically relevant with respect to the current options of targeted therapy in the rare instances where malignant AME tumors of the breast progress.

Immunohistochemical assessment of HRAS Q61R mutations in breast adenomyoepitheliomas.

AIMS: Breast adenomyoepitheliomas (AMEs) are uncommon tumours. Most oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive AMEs have mutations in phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway genes, whereas ER-negative AMEs usually harbour concurrent mutations affecting the HRAS Q61 hotspot and PI3K pathway genes. Here, we sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of RAS Q61R immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis for detection of HRAS Q61R mutations in AMEs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six AMEs (14 ER-positive; 12 ER-negative) previously subjected to massively parallel sequencing (n = 21) or Sanger sequencing (n = 5) of the HRAS Q61 hotspot locus were included in this study. All AMEs were subjected to IHC analysis with a monoclonal (SP174) RAS Q61R-specific antibody, in addition to detailed histopathological analysis. Nine ER-negative AMEs harboured HRAS mutations, including Q61R (n = 7) and Q61K (n = 2) mutations. Five of seven (71%) AMEs with HRAS Q61R mutations were immunohistochemically positive, whereas none of the AMEs lacking HRAS Q61R mutations (n = 17) were immunoreactive. RAS Q61R immunoreactivity was restricted to the myoepithelium in 80% (4/5) of cases, whereas one case showed immunoreactivity in both the epithelial component and the myoepithelial component. RAS Q61R immunohistochemically positive AMEs were associated with infiltrative borders (P < 0.001), necrosis (P < 0.01) and mitotic index in the epithelial (P < 0.05) and myoepithelial (P < 0.01) components. RAS Q61R IHC assessment did not reveal Q61K mutations (0/2). CONCLUSIONS: IHC analysis of RAS Q61R shows high specificity (100%) and moderate sensitivity (71%) for detection of HRAS Q61R mutations in breast AMEs, and appears not to detect HRAS Q61K mutations. IHC analysis of RAS Q61R may constitute a useful technique in the diagnostic workup of ER-negative AMEs.

Adenomyoepitheliomas of the Breast Frequently Harbor Recurrent Hotspot Mutations in PIK3-AKT Pathway-related Genes and a Subset Show Genetic Similarity to Salivary Gland Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma.

Adenomyoepitheliomas (AME) of the breast and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas (EMCs) of salivary gland are morphologically similar tumors defined by the presence of a biphasic population of ductal epithelial elements mixed with myoepithelial cells. We sought to explore the molecular profile of AMEs and determine whether they might also share the PLAG1, HMGA2, and HRAS alterations seen in EMCs. Tumor tissue from 19 AMEs was sequenced and analyzed using Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 covering ∼2800 COSMIC mutations across 50 cancer-related genes. Cases were additionally screened by FISH for PLAG1 and HMGA2 rearrangements. Of 19 AMEs (12 benign; 7 malignant), 2 cases failed the DNA extraction. Of the remaining 17 cases, 14 had at least one nonsynonymous mutation identified. The most common mutations were in PIK3CA (6/17) and AKT1 (5/17), which were mutually exclusive. Two tumors demonstrated mutations in APC, while 1 demonstrated an STK11 mutation. Mutations in ATM, EGFR, FGFR3 or GNAS were identified in 4 cases with concurrent AKT1 mutations. HRAS mutation co-occurring with PIK3CA mutation was noted in 1 case of ER-negative malignant AME. While 2 cases harbored alterations in HMGA2, none was positive for PLAG1 rearrangement. Our findings confirm that breast AMEs are genetically heterogeneous exhibiting recurrent mutually exclusive mutations of PIK3CA and AKT1 in a majority of cases. HRAS mutations co-occur with PIK3CA mutations in ER-negative AMEs and may possibly be linked to clinically aggressive behavior. We identified hotspot mutations in additional genes (APC, STK11, ATM, EGFR, FGFR3, and GNAS). We report the presence of HMGA2 alterations in 2/16 AMEs, supporting their relationship with EMC of salivary glands in at least a subset of cases. PIK3CA, AKT1 and HRAS may serve as potential actionable therapeutic targets in clinically aggressive AMEs.

Mammary Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma: Report of a Case With HRAS and PIK3CA Mutations by Next-Generation Sequencing.

We present the case of a 73-year-old woman with an epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the left breast (ie, malignant adenomyoepithelioma). In both the initial needle core biopsy and in the subsequently performed lumpectomy, the tumor consisted of nests of neoplastic epithelium and myoepithelium with cytologic atypia, increased mitoses, and infiltrative growth into the surrounding tissue. Mutational analysis showed oncogenic driver mutations in HRAS and PIK3CA. In this article, we describe an epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the breast with focal metaplastic differentiation, an extremely rare entity, and report the results of targeted next-generation sequencing. Our patient has not shown any evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease at 29 months follow-up.

MYB rearrangement and immunohistochemical expression in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: a comparison with adenoid cystic carcinoma.

AIMS: Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the breast have been noted to occur simultaneously, raising the possibility that AME may represent a related or precursor lesion to ACC. ACC frequently harbours genetic rearrangement of the MYB gene. We sought to clarify the relationship between AME and ACC by comparing their rates of MYB expression by IHC and MYB rearrangement by FISH. METHODS AND RESULTS: IHC and FISH for MYB rearrangement were performed on paraffin-embedded sections of 11 breast ACCs, 11 non-breast ACCs and 11 breast-AMEs. Using FISH, five of eight (63%) interpretable breast ACCs demonstrated MYB gene rearrangement. Nine of 11 (81%) breast ACCs demonstrated MYB expression (range = 20-95%). Of the three FISH-negative breast ACCs, two were solid variant and demonstrated strong MYB expression by IHC. Of the 10 interpretable non-breast ACCs, six showed MYB rearrangement, all of which were conventional type. Nine of these 11 (81%) cases showed MYB immunoexpression (range = 10-90%), including three solid-variant cases which were negative by FISH. No MYB rearrangements were detected by FISH in 10 interpretable AMEs. However, three of 11 cases (27%) showed weak to moderate MYB expression by IHC (range = 10-40%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that AMEs do not harbour MYB gene rearrangement. IHC for MYB may be helpful in diagnosing FISH-negative cases of ACC, particularly the diagnostically more difficult solid variants. However, weak to moderate MYB expression in a subset of AMEs highlights not only a potential diagnostic pitfall, but also shared pathophysiology with ACC worth investigating further at the genomic level.

Recurrent hotspot mutations in HRAS Q61 and PI3K-AKT pathway genes as drivers of breast adenomyoepitheliomas.

Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast is a rare tumor characterized by epithelial-myoepithelial differentiation, whose genetic underpinning is largely unknown. Here we show through whole-exome and targeted massively parallel sequencing analysis that whilst estrogen receptor (ER)-positive adenomyoepitheliomas display PIK3CA or AKT1 activating mutations, ER-negative adenomyoepitheliomas harbor highly recurrent codon Q61 HRAS hotspot mutations, which co-occur with PIK3CA or PIK3R1 mutations. In two- and three-dimensional cell culture models, forced expression of HRASQ61R in non-malignant ER-negative breast epithelial cells with or without a PIK3CAH1047R somatic knock-in results in transformation and the acquisition of the cardinal features of adenomyoepitheliomas, including the expression of myoepithelial markers, a reduction in E-cadherin expression, and an increase in AKT signaling. Our results demonstrate that adenomyoepitheliomas are genetically heterogeneous, and qualify mutations in HRAS, a gene whose mutations are vanishingly rare in common-type breast cancers, as likely drivers of ER-negative adenomyoepitheliomas.

Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of Laser-Microdissected Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tissue Specimens.

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) became widely used in molecular pathology. Comprehensive mutational profiling improved diagnosis and prognosis, as well as the identification of therapeutically relevant genetic alterations. However, the vast majority of studies analyzing tissue samples use DNA extracted from bulk tissue or only manually microdissected specimens. Laser-assisted microdissection offers the possibility of isolating morphologically defined small tissue compartments (like individual glands) or even of single cells for further molecular analysis. Even formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens can be used for laser-assisted microdissection. Combining these two innovative powerful methodological approaches provides invaluable insights into the genetic profile of any cell type and tissue compartment of interest, contributing to a better understanding of fundamental biological processes and disease-specific mechanisms.In this chapter, a detailed protocol is provided for microdissection of human mammary adenomyoepithelioma tissue specimens and subsequent targeted resequencing of a panel of cancer-related genes using IonTorrent/PGM technology.

Targeted sequencing may facilitate differential diagnostics of pulmonary tumours: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Histopathological diagnosis is important for prognostication and choice of treatment in patients with cancer in the lung. Metastases to the lungs are common and need to be distinguished from primary lung cancer. Furthermore, cases with synchronous or metachronous primary lung cancers (although infrequent) are often handled differently than cases with lung cancer with intrapulmonary metastasis or relapse, respectively. In some cases, morphology and immunohistochemical staining is not sufficient for certain diagnosis. METHODS: The present study included six cases where molecular genetic analysis in form of pyrosequencing or targeted next-generation sequencing was of value for certain diagnosis of selected tumours in the lung. RESULTS: Two of the included cases were rare metastases to the lung; colorectal cancer with IHC profile consistent with primary lung cancer and malignant adenomyoepithelioma of the breast, respectively, where molecular genetic analysis was of aid for proving the relationship to the primary tumour. The other four cases were multiple lung adenocarcinomas where molecular genetic analysis was of aid to distinguish between intrapulmonary metastasis and synchronous tumour. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of molecular genetic profile may be an important tool for determination of relationship between tumours in some situations and should always be considered in unclear cases. Further studies on concordance and discordance of molecular genetic profiles between spatially or temporally different tumours with common origin may be helpful for improved diagnostics of pulmonary tumours.

Adenomyoepithelioma with carcinoma of the breast: A report of two cases and a review of the literature.

We herein described two cases of adenomyoepithelioma (AME) with carcinoma of the breast. Both of them were Japanese women, and they presented with a mass in their breast. Post-operative specimens revealed encapsulated and well-circumscribed tumors with local invasion, necrosis, cytological atypia, and a high mitotic rate. In immunohistochemistry, coincidentally with the loose adhesion pattern of myoepithelial cells in both cases, the intensities of E-cadherin and beta-catenin were much weaker in myoepithelial than luminal epithelial cells, with almost negative finding of beta-catenin in one case. We first found deletion of CDH1 and polysomy of CEP16 in myoepithelial cells by double color-fluorescence in situ hybridization. The two cases have been followed up for 5-8 years, and both remained free from local recurrence and distant metastases. We also presented an overview of 47 cases of AME with carcinoma in English-language literatures.

Malignant myoepithelioma arising in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast and coincident multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumours in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1.

A 41-year-old female patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) presented with a breast lump and anaemia related to gastrointestinal bleeding. She was found to have malignant myoepithelioma of the breast and simultaneously multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) of the small bowel. Molecular studies showed a silent germline mutation in exon 9 of the KIT gene of both tumours. The common gene mutations characteristic of sporadic GISTs were not identified in these tumours, consistent with the literature, suggesting that gene mutations in GISTs are either absent or late events in patients with NF-1.